Friday February 15, 2008 09:15

How to Make Better Decisions

Posted by slipperytoad as Warts and All

These comments were prompted by a program that was recorded on that excellent piece of kit called my Sky Plus PVR. It was an episode from Horizon and the title was “How to make better decisions

I consider myself a good decision maker (well until I watched the program) and was interested in what scientists had to say about how we as humans make decisions in our day to day lives.
So what? Well, I watched the recording after my bet in the 8:20 at Wolverhampton yesterday. My tissue for the race was as follows

2/1 The Salwick Flyer, 2/1 Supercast, 6/1 Muncaster Castle

When reviewing the early morning prices I considered Muncaster Castle a value bet at 8/1 or better. The Salwick Flyer or Supercast were value at 5/2.

The eventual winner was Supercast. Here are the comments from the race.

1st Supercast (IRE) 9-4 S Hitchcott N J Vaughan 5 15/8 f always prominent, raced keenly, ridden over 1f out, led entering final furlong, driven out opened 11/4

4th The Salwick Flyer (IRE) 9-0 P Makin Miss L A Perratt 5 11/4 mid-division, pulled hard, headway over 2f out, staying on same pace when slightly hampered inside final furlong opened 15/8 touched 3/1 £1500-£500

5th Muncaster Castle (IRE) 8-13 C Catlin R F Fisher 4 12/1 chased leader, led over 2f out, ridden and headed entering final furlong, no extra towards finish

The results indicate that I handicapped the race correctly. However

Why did I decide to make small stake on my early value selection when it violated my “natural odds rule”? Was I subconsciously following the conformation bias?

Conformation bias confirms one’s preconceptions by looking for examples that are in line with our own viewpoint, but ignoring any information that might disprove it.

The quality books on handicapping suggest that you should not look at anyone’s assessment of the race until you have completed your own handicapping. Could conformation bias be the reason?

During pre-race betting Salwick Flyer and Supercast were both value selections at some time during that period, what/which approach should I take when this occurs? What happens when I have more that one overlay in the race? What happens if … … .. ?

My dilemma may confirm the fact touted by certain horse racing literature that some punters are excellent handicappers. The reason why their records show a loss is because they are poor decision makers.

Moving from “selection orientated” to “decision orientated” punter by way of my personal tissue should help things but after watching the program there is still a lot to consider when making decisions under pressure

Related Posts

Tags:

Comment Form

Recent posts

Thursday September 2, 2010 22:23

All Weather Racing – Making It Pay

While searching for some pace info on Dundalk Racecourse, found some very useful comments on the Irish Boards Forum 1. Treat Southwell form in...

Tuesday August 24, 2010 21:53

Houston … … We Have Lift Off

August started will a corrupted website database and ended with A total revamp of the website and forum software A subscription to Raceform...

It's easy to ridicule the behaviour of betting shop punters, labelling them "mugs", but this hive mentality is to be expected when so many in the...

Saturday August 7, 2010 21:33

Tools of the Trade

The ratings have proven to be consistent; however it became clear that at some stage I would require an updated dataset. I had a number of choices in...

Saturday July 31, 2010 12:11

Stewards Cup – 31st July 2010

As I’ve written many a time, I’m like a moth to a flame in these bookie sponsored, impossible to fathom, 28 runner sprint handicaps. The...

Categories